shaw v reno ap gov frq

(C) Describe a political action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Reynolds v. United States could take to attempt to impact the legality of bigamy. Gerrymandering occurs when one group or political party draws voting district boundaries in a way that gives a specific group of voters more power. Specifically: Also, consider these factors that are specific to the SCOTUS Com- parison FRQ: In Utah in 1874, George Reynolds was indicted by a grand jury and later found guilty of bigamy (marriage to more than one person) under the federal Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act, passed by Congress in 1862, which prohibited residents of territories to marry someone while still married to someone else. Shaw v. Reno (1993) Jurisdiction, 14th Amendment/Equal Shaw v. Reno (1993) Typically when it comes to the final component, we like using rebuttals more than concessions or refutations. Otherwise attempt to interfere with the proper working of the Website. B. (FRQ) on every exam that will require students to compare the facts, issue, arguments, or decisions in one of the required case to a non-required case. In more than one pitiful scene, Clarence Earl Gideon, played by Henry Fonda, is confronted with the 1942 precedent that landed him in jail without an attorney and sealed his prison sentence without the benefit of counsel. If you require an accessible version of any documents on this page, please email Accessibility@collegeboard.org. There was some discussion on the AP Government teachers Facebook page about whether a prompt that points to voter registration (Swifts) as a structural barrier, might also enable the age limit of 18 as an acceptable answer. Remove or refuse to post any User Contributions for any or no reason in our sole discretion. So, I was more anxious to see these released FRQs than the others. YOU ALSO GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION OR OTHER CLASS PROCEEDING. NEITHER THE COMPANY NOR ANY PERSON ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPLETENESS, SECURITY, RELIABILITY, QUALITY, ACCURACY, OR AVAILABILITY OF THE WEBSITE. Please contact usfor all other feedback, comments, requests for technical support, and other communications relating to the Website. Justice O'Connor applied strict scrutiny which asks the court to determine whether a race-based classification is narrowly tailored, has a compelling government interest and offers the "least restrictive" means of achieving that governmental interest. Your use of the Website does not grant to you ownership of any content, software, code, date or materials you may access on the Website. With my rounding, Democrats won 48% of the seats and Republicans won 52%. Justice O'Connor, on behalf of the majority, found that redistricting plans could take race into account in order to comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but race could not be the sole or predominant factor when drawing a district. A difference between League of United Latin American Citizens v.Perry and Shaw v.Reno is that Shaw v.Reno was a dispute over an irregularly shaped district that suppressed minority, specifically Black, voters.League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry was also a dispute over legislative districts, but it was between the Plaintiffs and Republicans. I would assume with more time, the acceptable answers that formulate at the Reading will differ slightly. Here are the 4 different FRQs that will be included: Concept Application: Respond to a political scenario, describe and explain the effects of a political institution, behavior, or process WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, NEITHER THE COMPANY NOR ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY REPRESENTS OR WARRANTS THAT THE WEBSITE, ITS CONTENT, OR ANY SERVICES OR ITEMS OBTAINED THROUGH THE WEBSITE WILL BE ACCURATE, RELIABLE, ERROR-FREE, OR UNINTERRUPTED, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, THAT OUR SITE OR THE SERVER THAT MAKES IT AVAILABLE ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS, OR THAT THE WEBSITE OR ANY SERVICES OR ITEMS OBTAINED THROUGH THE WEBSITE WILL OTHERWISE MEET YOUR NEEDS OR EXPECTATIONS. As with any Court ruling about a federal law, citizens can take political action to protest it, such as trying to influence Congress. Consider writing a few quick notes to refresh your memory about the required case so that you can keep the cases straight and make a solid plan for answering the various parts of the prompt. If any provision of these Terms of Use is held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions of the Terms of Use will continue in full force and effect. These required cases tend to appear throughout the AP exam multiple choice. : an American History (Eric Foner), Campbell Biology (Jane B. Reece; Lisa A. Urry; Michael L. Cain; Steven A. Wasserman; Peter V. Minorsky), Biological Science (Freeman Scott; Quillin Kim; Allison Lizabeth), Principles of Environmental Science (William P. Cunningham; Mary Ann Cunningham), Forecasting, Time Series, and Regression (Richard T. O'Connell; Anne B. Koehler), Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing (Janice L. Hinkle; Kerry H. Cheever). The District Court, on remand, must determine whether there is racial gerrymandering, and if so, determine whether the plan is narrowly tailored to further a compelling governmental interest. To access the Website or some of the resources it offers, you may be asked to provide certain registration details or other information. For any academic source materials such as textbooks and workbooks which you submit to us in connection with our online tutoring services, you represent and warrant that you are entitled to upload such materials under the fair use doctrine of copyright law. In Shaw v. Reno (1993), the U.S. Supreme Court questioned the use of racial gerrymandering in North Carolina's reapportionment plan. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PROVIDED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL THE COMPANY, ITS AFFILIATES, OR THEIR LICENSORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OFFICERS, OR DIRECTORS BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, UNDER ANY LEGAL THEORY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR USE, OR INABILITY TO USE, THE WEBSITE, ANY WEBSITES LINKED TO IT, ANY CONTENT ON THE WEBSITE OR SUCH OTHER WEBSITES, INCLUDING ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL INJURY, PAIN AND SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS, LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF GOODWILL, LOSS OF DATA, AND WHETHER CAUSED BY TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), BREACH OF CONTRACT, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF FORESEEABLE. Impersonate any person, or misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person or organization. Reynolds argued that it was his religious duty to marry multiple wives, and thus the practice should be protected under the First Amendment. Star Athletica, L.L.C. Reynolds, a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS Church), presented himself as a test case to challenge the Morrill Act, arguing that the law violated LDS Church members First Amendment freedom of religion rights. Match. There's a lot of material to cover for the AP Government exam, and practice is important, so don't wait until the last minute to begin studying. All of your User Contributions do and will comply with these Terms of Use. Promote any illegal activity, or advocate, promote, or assist any unlawful act. The general assembly drafted a re-apportionment plan that created one Black-majority district. Shaw v. Reno is an important decision because it represents a conservative shift on the Court. The 1982 election made me think of the Reagan Democrats probably rising in number as early as 1982 (though theyre usually noted in the 1984 presidential election) and other forces, many of which should be acceptable on this question. It is a condition of your use of the Website that all the information you provide on the Website is correct, current, and complete. Shaw sued on the basis that the plan violated several constitutional principles, including the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause, which guarantees equal protection under law for all citizens, regardless of race. The decision in Shaw v. Reno led to nationwide changes after the 2000 Census. Summary: Since the earliest days of the republic, redrawing the boundaries of legislative and congressional districts after each decennial census has been . However, five white North Carolina voters filed a lawsuit against federal and state officials. These emails may be transaction or relationship communications relating to the products or services we offer, such as administrative notices and service announcements or changes, or emails containing commercial offers, promotions or special offers from us. You should use particular caution when accessing your account from a public or shared computer so that others are not able to view or record your password or other personal information. Cause annoyance, inconvenience, or needless anxiety or be likely to upset, embarrass, alarm, or annoy any other person. Attempt to gain unauthorized access to, interfere with, damage, or disrupt any parts of the Website, the server on which the Website is stored, or any server, computer, or database connected to the Website. We reserve the right to withdraw or amend this Website, and any service or material we provide on the Website, in our sole discretion without notice. The Website and its entire contents, features, and functionality (including but not limited to all information, software, text, displays, images, graphics, video, other visuals, and audio, and the design, selection, and arrangement thereof) are owned by the Company, its licensors, or other providers of such material and are protected by United States and international copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, and other intellectual property or proprietary rights laws. Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (2010), Baker v Carr (1961), Shaw v Reno . The general assembly took another look at the maps and drew in a second majority-minority district in the north-central region of the state, along Interstate 85. By providing any User Contribution on the Website, you grant us and our affiliates and service providers, and each of their and our respective licensees, successors, and assigns the right to use, reproduce, modify, perform, display, distribute, and otherwise disclose to third parties any such material for any purpose. https://www.thoughtco.com/shaw-v-reno-4768502 (accessed March 2, 2023). Answer: 1. You are not permitted to link directly to any image hosted on the Website or our products or services, such as using an in-line linking method to cause the image hosted by us to be displayed on another website. Shaw v Reno FRQ Scotus scoring - Shaw v Reno FRQ SCOTUS Scoring Guide Following the 1990 census, - Studocu pressure between the blood and dialysate within the filter, thereby allowing for rapid solute and fluid removal (Fig. AP U.S. Government and Politics Past Exam Questions Free-Response Questions Download free-response questions from past exams along with scoring guidelines, sample responses from exam takers, and scoring distributions. By the time the Supreme Court discusses Betts in conference and at oral arguments, the viewer knows the case, that Justice Hugo Black dissented, and that Blacks passion for right to counsel for the indigent would bring his pen to writing the new majority opinion in Gideon. I showed the full, award-less movie to my College Prep classes, but new tech, limited DVD access, and time constraints prevented a showing to my AP classes. Establish a link from any website that is not owned by you. Use any illustrations, photographs, video or audio sequences, or any graphics separately from the accompanying text. All changes are effective immediately when we post them, and apply to all access to and use of the Website thereafter. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. v. Rodriguez, Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Test. They merely allege that the redistricting plan is so irregular on its face that it is clearly an effort to segregate voters by race without appropriate justification. (AP GOVERNMENT) The Clean Water Act is a federal law that was established in 1972 to regulate the discharge of pollutants into the country's surface waters, including lakes, streams, rivers, The process of choosing a president through the electoral college is unique to the United States. For the SCOTUS comparison, I committed a major classroom crime. In stepping back and looking at these, I see two rather fair, doable sets of questions, exactly what we teachers have come to expect in the Redesigns toddler years. If you choose, or are provided with, a user name, password, or any other piece of information as part of our security procedures, you must treat such information as confidential, and you must not disclose it to any other person or entity. Link from your own or certain third-party websites to certain content on this Website. You hereby irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of those courts for such purposes. The State of North Carolina, in response to the U.S. Attorney Generals, Five white North Carolina voters sued, alleging that the States, The District Court dismissed the suit, finding that race-based districting is not prohibited by the, The U.S. Supreme Court reversed that decision, holding that the case should not have been dismissed because the voters made a valid claim under the. By using the Website or by clicking to accept or agree to the Terms of Use when this option is made available to you, you accept and agree to be bound and abide by these Terms of Use. Decisions by the arbitrator are enforceable in court and may be overturned by a court only for very limited reasons. Citizens could attempt to get Congress to change the law by writing and trying to persuade their representatives. (2020, December 4). According to the residents' complaint, racial gerrymandering prevented voters from participating in a color-blind voting process. Use any manual process to monitor or copy any of the material on the Website or for any other unauthorized purpose without our prior written consent. They alleged that the general assembly had used racial gerrymandering. for the AP U.S. Government and Politics Redesign . ThoughtCo, Dec. 4, 2020, thoughtco.com/shaw-v-reno-4768502. A statement by you, made under the penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owners behalf. Part A will often ask you to identify a constitutional clause or principle that is relevant to both cases. Under Shaw v. Reno, redistricting can be held to the same legal standard as laws that explicitly classify by race. Shaw v. Reno, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases] Heimler's History 446K subscribers Subscribe 1.7K 107K views 1 year ago AP Government Unit 2 Review GET FOLLOW-ALONG. The Court has abandoned settled law to decide this case. If you do not meet all of these requirements, you must not access or use the Website. An age restriction seems just more established law. The History of the case Who won at the trial court level? The racial gerrymander is one of those tools. Justice Sandra Day OConnor delivered the 5-4 decision. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Cause the Website or portions of it to be displayed on, or appear to be displayed by, any other site, for example, framing, deep linking, or in-line linking. The creation of a majority-black district makes up for centuries of discrimination. Residents argued that the state had gone too far when redrawing district lines to create a second majority-minority district. I checked the math anyway, based on the listing for who served in the 98th Congress commencing in January 1983 from the Biographical Directory of Congress. No right, title, or interest in or to the Website or any content on the Website is transferred to you, and all rights not expressly granted are reserved by the Company. Who won at the U.S. Supreme Court. The Foundational Docs offered also look plausible. Violate the legal rights (including the rights of publicity and privacy) of others or contain any material that could give rise to any civil or criminal liability under applicable laws or regulations or that otherwise may be in conflict with these Terms of Use and our. shaw v reno ap gov frq. (B) Based on the constitutional clause identified in Part A, explain why the facts of Wisconsin v. Yoder led to a different holding than the holding in Reynolds v. United States. The three judge District Court held Districts 18, 29, and 30 unconstitutional. In addition, if you request that our system display a representation of a page or problem from a textbook or workbook, you represent and warrant that you are in proper legal possession of such textbook or workbook and that your instruction to our system to display a page or problem from your textbook or workbook is made for the sole purpose of facilitating your tutoring session, as fair use under copyright law. Also, citizens could draw attention to the issue during future elections and attempt to elect candidates who would support changing the law prohibiting bigamy. Terms in this set (5) holding. You understand and acknowledge that you are responsible for any User Contributions you submit or contribute, and you, not the Company, have full responsibility for such content, including its legality, reliability, accuracy, and appropriateness. User Contributions must in their entirety comply with all applicable federal, state, local, and international laws and regulations. Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both South Dakota v.docx, Queens Gateway To Health Sciences Secondary Schoo, During the time of conducting the surveys some employees in the construction, How does an institution determine whether a students academic programme complies, 132 PP DTLP 3 Residential Building means a building in which atleast 23 rd of, He died of cancer 3 I went to hospital to visit my uncle I went to hospital to, This PAS is complemented by the Pensions Office Guide to the Local Government, Pakenham Institute Pty Ltd RTO No 41536 l CRICOS Code 03941H I Website, C takes on values with respective probabilities and D, 338 CHAPTER 9 DEVELOPING Thats not usually the case Like any other work the, HHHHHHHHHHHeeeeeeee wwwwwwwaaaaaaasssssss, ATI - Basic Concepts - Caring for Immunocomprimised pt.jpeg, Computer Science Principles and Practice - 3000 words - NA - FK - DA.docx, True or false The plan do study act cycle is also known as the Shewhart cycle or, A patient diagnosed with bipolar disorder and who takes lithium telephones the, Vincent Bindus - New Deal Programs Chart.pdf. . Match. Send emails or other communications with certain content, or links to certain content, on this Website. San Antonio Indep. Flashcards. Did North Carolina violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment when it established a second majority-minority district through racial gerrymandering, in response to a request from the attorney general? Looks like we all should have shown it (or parts of it). For instance, you could be asked how citizens could react to a ruling with which they disagree. North Carolinas 1990 census entitled the state to a 12th seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative districts that cannot be explained through any means other than race may be struck down in court. Your continued use of the Website following the posting of revised Terms of Use means that you accept and agree to the changes. You must not use such Trademarks without the prior written permission of the Company. "Shaw v. Reno: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact." Hopefully these released examples help them. From time to time, we may restrict access to some parts of the Website, or the entire Website, to users, including registered users. https://www.kaptest.com/study/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AP-US-Government-and-Politics-Scotus-Comparison.jpg, http://wpapp.kaptest.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/kaplan_logo_purple_726-4.png, AP U.S. Government and Politics: SCOTUS Comparison. Miller v. Johnson (1995) declared that a gerrymandered district in Georgia (very similar to the one in North Carolina) was unconstitutional because it was predominantly race based. Ive not gotten to the Plain Dealer source cited at bottom of the illustration yet, but there was at least one incomplete term and perhaps a special election during that era. You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Company, its affiliates, licensors, and service providers, and its and their respective officers, directors, employees, contractors, agents, licensors, suppliers, successors, and assigns from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, judgments, awards, losses, costs, expenses, or fees (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to your violation of these Terms of Use or your use of the Website, including, but not limited to, your User Contributions, any use of the Website's content, services, and products other than as expressly authorized in these Terms of Use or your use of any information obtained from the Website. Part A: Free exercise clause. The case established that any legislative redistricting must be strictly scrutinized and that any laws related to racially motivated redistricting must be held to narrow standards and compelling government interests. The Supreme Court continues to hear cases about gerrymandering and racially motivated districts. What could be more essential to the course, and fairer in terms of expectation. Access to the Website may not be legal by certain persons or in certain countries. The White North Carolina voters could not show that they were disenfranchised as a result of the second, oddly shaped majority-minority district, Justice White wrote. No big whoop. Interactions Among Branches of Government Notes. Introduce any viruses, Trojan horses, worms, logic bombs, or other material that is malicious or technologically harmful. Think about what features you can incorporate into your own free-response answers. Youll see a similar example on p. 176 in the AMSCO book. To score well on your AP U.S. Government and Politics Exam, it is important to become familiar with all of the required Supreme Court cases. United States Supreme Court. To transmit, or procure the sending of, any advertising or promotional material, including any "junk mail", "chain letter", "spam", or any other similar solicitation. Work for Kaplan Shaw V. Reno Civil Liberties vs Civil Rights 17th Amendment 2nd Amendment 3rd Amendment 4th Amendment Bostock v Clayton County District of Columbia v. Heller Double Jeopardy Engel v Vitale Establishment Clause First Amendment Flag Protection Act of 1989 Free Exercise Clause Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Freedom of the Press Gideon v. The Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and Terms of Sale constitute the sole and entire agreement between you and Marco Learning LLC regarding the Website and supersede all prior and contemporaneous understandings, agreements, representations, and warranties, both written and oral, regarding the Website. Your rights may be determined by a NEUTRAL ARBITRATOR, NOT A JUDGE OR JURY. This Website may provide certain social media features that enable you to: You may use these features solely as they are provided by us, and solely with respect to the content they are displayed with and otherwise in accordance with any additional terms and conditions we provide with respect to such features. There is no constitutional requirement of compactness or contiguity for districts. Shaw v. Reno (1993) Legislative redistricting must be conscious of race and ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the principle of judicial review empowering the Supreme Court to nullify an act of the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution Top 25 Cases Article You agree not to use the Website: If you use, or assist another person in using the Website in any unauthorized way, you agree that you will pay us an additional $50 per hour for any time we spend to investigate and correct such use, plus any third party costs of investigation we incur (with a minimum $300 charge). Shaw v. Reno is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addressed the limits of gerrymandering in the creation of majority-minority congressional districts. All information we collect on this Website is subject to our Privacy Policy. Infringe any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, or other intellectual property or other rights of any other person. Copy_of_FRQ_Prep_SCOTUS_Individual_Exit_Ticket, 3.07_Checks,_Balances,_and_Accountability_.pdf, Dana Al-Zibdeh - Court Case FRQ Practice - 10253003.pdf, PCPS_Mathematics_Curriculum_and_Pacing_Guide--Grade_5_Q2.pdf, Invoice number already exists So take appropriate action ENDIF There is one, Zimu Li_M9 Assessment EAW2 Peer Evaluation V4.0.docx, The reformed CFS architecture includes four key components production of, So now we have project life cycle and we have product life cycle So what is the, Quiz re_ Lecture 7_ The Legal System Part Four.pdf, three years 0rom now Tom will need to deposit twice the amount o0 money today as, by suggestion and you only need to create a new metastate to control meaning of, The uterine artery A passes superior to the ureter at the lateral fornix of the, Hospitals do have specific competencies in handling acute episodes of chronic, Classwork #1_ Historical Thinking Skills (3).docx, mnemonic for amino acid _ CYP450 Inducer and Inhibitor .jpg, merit badge fair pre reqs 2022 (3) (1).docx, Use test data to process sufficient sales so that the inventory levels of a, Final project Organisational economics.docx, This Greek goddess039s name was chosen for the dwarf planet responsible for. Modify copies of any materials from this site. Johnny Burkowski has offered lists for Set 1 and Set 2 on the AP Gov Facebook page. THE FOREGOING DOES NOT AFFECT ANY LIABILITY THAT CANNOT BE EXCLUDED OR LIMITED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. At the time, North Carolinas voting-age population was 78% White, 20% Black, 1% Indigenous, and 1% Asian. Reno (North Carolina): -Because of precedent case (Jewish Organization v. Carey) redistricting on race was legal. Shaw v. Reno (1993) United States v. Lopez (1995) McDonald v. Chicago (2010) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) Adam Norris has a great 11-minute review video on these fifteen cases here. An Overview: FRQs on the AP US Gov Exam On your AP Government exam in May, you will be asked to write 4 FRQs. Congress had amended the VRA in 1982 to target "vote dilution" in which members of a specific racial minority were spread thin across a district to decrease their ability to ever gain a voting majority. These Terms of Use permit you to use the Website for your personal, non-commercial use only. The first thing you will notice about both Scenario prompt FRQ #1 is the College Board question committees desire to reach students and to prove hip with the subject. You agree that we own all transcripts and recordings of such sessions and that these Terms of Use will be deemed an irrevocable assignment of rights in all such transcripts and recordings to us. This is really only the 2nd full round of the national exam post-redesign. Surely our minds went to gerrymandering, and what seems to be the Week 1 consensus on what the question is primarily trying to elicit. In a 5-4 opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the shape of the proposed district in North Carolina was bizarre enough that it could not be explained as anything other than an attempt to separate voters along racial lines. This includes links contained in advertisements, including banner advertisements and sponsored links. Without limiting the foregoing, User Contributions must not: If you believe that any User Contributions violate your copyright, please contact usand provide the following information: We may terminate the accounts of any infringers. for all other feedback, comments, requests for technical support, and other communications relating to the Website. Terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Website for any or no reason, including without limitation, any violation of these Terms of Use. Five of the eight Justices who participated in the decision resolved the case under the framework the Court previously had adopted for vote-dilution cases. The VRA required an increase in the representation of minority groups. It is ironic that it does so when white voters challenge a law that would have North Carolina send a black representative to Congress for the first time since Reconstruction. You agree that if you include a link from any other website to the Website, such link will open in a new browser window and will link to the full version of an HTML formatted page of this Website. These are two rather good and reasonable designs for students in this course. There may be qualitative analysis and comparison .

Best Mount For Garmin Edge 530, House Of Angels Funeral Home Lubbock Obituaries, Ben Jones Wmaz First Wife, Ncaa Swimming Results Archive, What Color Should I Wear Tomorrow Horoscope, Articles S